Saturday, April 30, 2011

Libyan Forces Chase Rebel Convoy Into Tunisia


The fighting in Libya briefly spilled into neighboring Tunisia on Friday when troops loyal to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi forced rebels from a border crossing in the northwest of Libya and pursued them into a nearby Tunisian town, according to a rebel spokesman and fighter who witnessed the events
Government forces attacked a convoy of rebel fighters and supply trucks at the checkpoint at Wazen in midmorning, said Tarek Bodrani, the fighter, who was reached by telephone. Mr. Bodrani said a pro-Qaddafi force with about 30 vehicles struck from the north and south, and seven pickup trucks carrying antiaircraft machine guns followed rebels toward the Tunisian town, Dhiba, roughly three miles away.
One government pickup truck crashed and the others were stopped, and the pro-Qaddafi soldiers were detained after being confronted by a roadblock operated by the Tunisian military and local residents. Col. Ahmed Omar Bani, a rebel spokesman, said Colonel Qaddafi’s forces fired mortar shells onto Tunisian soil during the chase.
Outraged Tunisian officials summoned a Libyan envoy to complain about the incursion, Al Jazeera reported. Libyan ordnance reportedly fell in Tunisian territory on Thursday as well, when fighting for control of the Wazen post began, wounding some civilians and potentially further imperiling the Libyan government, which is already fighting on multiple fronts and facing a NATO air campaign.
In an address broadcast live early on Saturday, Colonel Qaddafi called for negotiations with NATO, Reuters reported. “Let us negotiate with you, the countries that attack us,” he said.
The rebels had captured the border post at Wazen with hopes of opening a supply route for opposition fighters battling Colonel Qaddafi’s troops in Libya’s western mountains. The fate of that ambition is now unclear, as was the status of the captured Libyan soldiers.
In Libya’s most violent area, in the besieged coastal city of Misurata, fighting erupted across a broad front along the city’s south and west, as rebel fighters pressed toward the city’s airport and faced a fresh ground attack on their western flank.
The fighting in Misurata began early in the morning and raged throughout the day. The city’s edge became a cacophony of machine-gun and mortar fire, punctuated by the rolling explosions of ground-to-ground rocket strikes in neighborhoods behind the front lines.
As the two sides fought, Misurata’s troubles appeared to deepen further as NATO said that pro-Qaddafi forces had been caught Friday mining the waters around the harbor to harass traffic from the sea, which has been the sole lifeline for a city otherwise cut off by loyalist ground troops.
Three mines were discovered and were being disposed of, NATO said in a statement, adding that the devices were being laid two to three kilometers offshore when the inflatable boats on which they were being carried were deliberately sunk.
At least one vessel with humanitarian aid scheduled to enter the port on Friday delayed its arrival and waited off the coast for an all-clear sign from NATO, medical officials in the city said.
Supplies from the sea have been integral to the city’s survival during the two-month siege, as internationally chartered aid ships have delivered food, water, medicine and ambulances, and evacuated thousands of migrant workers and many wounded Libyans in need of treatment not available in the city.
A flotilla of rebel fishing vessels and tugboats have also smuggled in weapons, ammunition and other military equipment, allowing the sparsely supplied rebels to push forward against Colonel Qaddafi’s conventionally equipped troops.
The fighting on two fronts in the Misurata area on Friday appeared to signal simultaneous thrusts, in different places — one by the rebels and the other by loyalist troops.
The loyalists, backed by at least three tanks, struck first, trying to push into and through the village of Zawit al-Mahjoub early in the morning, fighters and medical officials said. The rebels repelled the attack, but not before three tanks entered the village, six rebel fighters were killed and at least 10 more were wounded, a doctor treating them said.
As the battle in the village continued, rebel groups were pushing southward toward the airport, which is still held by the loyalists, and meeting stiff resistance from Colonel Qaddafi’s troops dug in around the airfield or garrisoned within.
By midmorning, a large battle had been joined, and mortar fire was landing, in explosion after explosion, near rebels clustered and hiding in buildings and behind walls.
Most of the pro-Qaddafi forces inside the city have been killed or chased out. But the Qaddafi units control the city’s approaches and many remain at Misurata’s edges, from where they have been shelling the city at will. A rebel commander, who said he had been a lieutenant colonel in the Libyan military before joining the opposition, said the immediate goal of the southern thrust was to push the pro-Qaddafi units from the airport and ultimately out of rocket range.
“Right now nowhere in the city is safe, and we worry about our mothers, our wives and our daughters,” he said. The commander, who provided his name, asked that it be withheld from publication to prevent retaliation against his family.
As machine-gun fire crackled and mortar rounds landed in the neighborhood, a second officer, whose fighters identified him as a police colonel who had defected from the government’s side, said the rebels did not know how many loyalist troops were defending the airport.
The rebels have not managed to encircle the airfield, he said, and the Qaddafi forces control an access road to the airport that connects them to the rest of Libya. Their numbers, the officer said, seemed to fluctuate each day.
The fighting built in intensity as the hours passed. Shortly after 1 p.m. the Qaddafi forces struck the city with a heavy barrage of rockets, which landed in a civilian neighborhood, miles away from the fighting. The smoke and dust of multiple explosions could be seen from afar.
A few minutes later, a shoe factory near the airport was struck by munitions and set ablaze. A dense column of black smoke rose, forming a cloud that drifted over Misurata.
The smoke continued to rise at sunset, when funeral processions for many rebels and civilians killed in the day’s fighting wound through the city.
In Benghazi, the rebel capital, the National Transitional Council, as the de facto rebel government calls itself, pledged in a communiqué that “no forces under its command” would use antipersonnel or antivehicular land mines.
Whether the council and its forces have the means or command-and-control capacity to live up to these pledges remains to be seen; many rebel groups have demonstrated poor discipline in the field, especially in eastern Libya, and the council’s ability to supervise the forces is not always evident.
By C. J. CHIVERS and SCOTT SAYARE
@NYTIMES

Appeals Court Overturns Stem Cell Research Ban


Opponents of taxpayer-funded stem cell research lost a key round in a U.S. appeals court Friday.

In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the court of appeals in Washington overturned a judge's order that would have blocked taxpayer funding for stem cell research. The judges ruled that opponents of taxpayer-funded stem cell research are not likely to succeed in their lawsuit to stop it.
The panel reversed an opinion issued last August by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, who said the research likely violates the law against federal funding of embryo destruction.
"We're thrilled with this decision and look forward to allowing federally funded scientists to continue with their work without political constraints," said Sean Tipton, a spokesman for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Researchers hope one day to use stem cells in ways that cure spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's disease and other ailments. Opponents say the research is a form of abortion because human embryos must be destroyed to obtain the stem cells.
The 1996 law prohibits the use of taxpayer dollars in work that harms an embryo, so private money has been used to cull batches of the cells. Those batches can reproduce in lab dishes indefinitely, and the Obama administration issued rules permitting taxpayer dollars to be used in work on them
The lawsuit was filed by two scientists who argued that President Obama's expansion jeopardized their ability to win government funding for research using adult stem cells — ones that have already matured to create specific types of tissues — because it will mean extra competition.

Lamberth, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, issued a preliminary injunction in August to block the research while the case continued.
The Obama administration immediately appealed and requested the order be stopped. The appeals court quickly ruled that the research could continue at the National Institutes of Health while the judges took up the case.
The opinion tossing out Lamberth's ruling was written by Judge Douglas Ginsburg, nominated to the court by President Ronald Reagan, and supported by Judge Thomas Griffith, a nominee of President George W. Bush. The dissent came from Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, a nominee of President George H.W. Bush; she agreed with the lower court judge that the lawsuit was likely to succeed.
As a result of the appellate ruling Friday, the original lawsuit can continue before Judge Lamberth, but the taxpayer-funded research also will go on. Lamberth hasn't thus far either held a trial or issued a final ruling, which he could do based on court filings without taking testimony.
Once the cells are culled, they can reproduce in lab dishes indefinitely. So government policies said using taxpayer dollars to work with the already-created batches of cells is allowed.
The Obama administration has expanded the number of stem cell lines created with private money that federally funded scientists could research, up from the 21 that President George W. Bush had allowed to at least 75 so far. To qualify, parents who donate the original embryo must be told of other options, such as donating to another infertile woman.
Congress twice passed legislation specifically calling for tax-funded stem cell research, which President Bush vetoed.

@AP
Pic : Judge Royce Lamberth

The Royals Need To Earn Their Keep


Amid the flag-waving and the street parties to celebrate the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton today, bigger questions about the relevance of the monarchy to modern Britain lurk like uninvited guests. Extravagant living in a time of austerity abrades public sensibilities; unearned privilege is resented, while snobbery and elitism are seen as dangerously outmoded. The usual arguments in support of the monarchy — continuity, tradition and dignity — are no longer enough. The royals need to earn their keep.
While only a small minority here favor a republican government, many Britons hope the wedding might signal the dawning of a more populist monarchy. This is the marriage of a senior royal prince and a commoner — the first in 350 years — that spans the class divide and is, it seems, a marriage for love. These two met in college, have lived in a shared house with friends, and plan to spend at least the first few years of their married life in northern Wales, with William continuing his service as a search-and-rescue pilot for the Royal Air Force. They have caught the public’s imagination not because of outdated deference to royalty but because of their appearance of normality and togetherness even amid the strictures of royal protocol and the frenzy of press coverage.
Comparisons have of course been drawn to the wedding of William’s parents, Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer. Diana was young, aristocratic, naïve and intimidated, whereas Kate is older, middle-class, educated, respected by her groom and undoubtedly wiser to the pressures that will surround her. But the circumstances are similar: in 1981, as now, Britain was mired in economic difficulty and the public was expected to welcome the opulence of the ceremony as a respite from hardship.
To understand how a wedding could accomplish that, it is instructive to look much further back than 1981 — to a time before royal weddings meant much at all to ordinary Britons.
Consider Mary Tudor’s 1554 marriage to Philip of Spain. Officials feared that the public might object to the queen, herself half-Spanish, marrying a Spanish prince. And so the nuptials were performed some 50 miles from London, at Winchester Cathedral. It was an alliance born of the mutual strategic interest forged by the marriage of Mary’s parents, Henry VIII and Katherine of Aragon.
Royal marriages had long been arranged for diplomatic and political reasons. In 1420, Henry V married Catherine of Valois in an attempt at peace with France during the Hundred Years’ War; in 1589, James I married Anne of Denmark to establish a strong Protestant alliance in Europe; in 1625, Charles I married Henrietta Maria of France during a brief period when England’s pro-Spanish policy was replaced by a pro-French one.
Under the Stuarts, royal brides were mainly Catholic, which jarred a Protestant nation. The monarchs of the German House of Hanover, which acceded in 1714, invariably wed Germans of similar rank.
What finally changed all this was a remaking — indeed a rebranding — of the monarchy in 1917. England and Germany were at war, so another marriage to a German was out of the question. Instead, what was then the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was renamed the House of Windsor, and George V decreed that his children could now “marry English men and English women.” In that moment the all-British monarchy was born. And royal weddings became big events to be celebrated publicly and patriotically.
When the future George VI married Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon in 1923, wedding fever engulfed the country. Newspapers and magazines scrutinized every detail: the dress, the guests, the venue. A million people lined the route from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey. There were fireworks and parties in the streets.
The wedding of Charles and Diana followed this tradition. The ceremony was moved from the abbey to the larger St. Paul’s Cathedral, and much of the country watched on television. Celebratory merchandise, from mugs and plates to plastic trays and tea towels, were sold worldwide. The royal family had become the ultimate British brand.
As the wedding unfolds today, many people here will be keenly aware that this is a spectacle to which they, the taxpayers, have contributed. Britons want to see their royals demonstrating “value for money,” to be seen to be in touch, to have a greater ethos of service and to be more than vacuous figureheads propped up by pomp and pageantry. In a democratic age of mass media, maintaining public favor has never been more critical.
Queen Elizabeth II’s longevity — next year will be her 60th on the throne — has in many ways suspended public discussion of the reform and modernization of the monarchy.
This might prove to be the biggest threat to the royal future: more than half of Britons now believe William should succeed the queen. With Charles first in line, there is a real prospect that William and Kate will not become king and queen until they are middle-aged. By then, the honeymoon will be over, their public appeal will surely have waned and the new “classless” monarchy that their marriage symbolized may well have arrived too late.
@NYTIMES

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Alzheimer's Association


It's always satisfying to pursue worthy ideas and join a right cause.
Lethean Cottage is glad to share some useful information  with the readers in order to improve the public understanding about the disease.
if you're willing to join the cause :

Facebook.com/actionalz
twitter.com/alzassociation
and here :you can find some useful information about the disease
and you can add some useful items to your website:use texts,videos,banners,etc so we can make sure as many people as possible have access to the basic information.
Regards
Pedram 

Melanoma : Clinical Pearls and Morning Report Questions

Clinical Pearls


What are the currently approved treatments for metastatic melanoma?
The two therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration, high-dose interleukin-2 and dacarbazine, are each associated with response rates of only 10 to 20% and a small percentage of complete responses; neither is thought to improve overall survival. In randomized trials, the median survival among patients treated with dacarbazine was less than 8 months.
How prevalent is the v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF) mutation among patients with metastatic melanoma?
A search for mutations in a component of the MAP kinase pathway in a large panel of common cancers revealed that 40 to 60% of melanomas, and 7 to 8% of all cancers, carry an activating mutation in BRAF.

Morning Report Questions

Q. How effective was the oral inhibitor of BRAF, PLX4032, in treating patients with metastatic melanoma?
A. This trial demonstrated that therapy targeting tumors containing activating V600E BRAF mutations can induce clinically significant tumor regression in patients. PLX4032 induced clinically significant tumor regression in 81% of patients who had melanoma with the V600E BRAF mutation. Responses were observed at all sites of disease, including the bone, liver, and small intestine.
Q. What tumors emerged in patients treated with PLX4032?
A. Eight patients in the dose-escalation cohort (15%) and 10 patients in the extension cohort (31%) developed cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas — a total of 35 carcinomas. These were reviewed centrally, and all but one either were keratoacanthomas or had features of a keratoacanthoma. The median time to the appearance of a cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was 8 weeks; the majority of the carcinomas were resected, and in no case did any lead to discontinuation of treatment.

Monday, April 25, 2011

Fly


Fly
Fly
Up
and out


Fly
It's putrid
It's cold
My world

People
Are hateful


It's  putrid
It's cold

Fly 
Fly
Up 
and out

Fly
Sway
The blue sky

Shed a tear 
for me 
and the abhorred

Pedram

Friday, April 22, 2011

خاطرات 4

آموزشی من یک روز دیرتر از همه ی همدوره ایهام تمام شد. پنج شنبه ساعت 9:30 صبح نامه معرفیم را گرفتم و از پادگان خارج شدم.پادگانی که خالی از نیروهای آموزشی شده بود. اردیبهشت با 24 ساعت پر استرس برای من آغاز شد.حقیقت آن است که به خودم نمره ی قبولی نمی دهم. از نمایشی که داشتم و از طرز مواجهه با استرس خودم بسیار ناامید شدم،انتظار من خیلی بیشتر بود.زندگی من از این اسان تر نخواهد شد .این وظیفه من است که پاسخ خوبی به این اتفاقات بدهم.

Friday, April 15, 2011

My Author Of the Month (March)

My Author of The Month (February)

Sæglópur (Lost at Sea)

Sæglópur, á lífi
kominn heim
Sæglópur, á lífi
kominn heim
það kemur kafari
kominn heim
það kemur kafari
kominn heim

ENGLISH TRANSLATION
A lost seafarer, alive
has returned home
A lost seafarer, alive
has returned home
a diver comes
has returned home
a diver comes
has returned home
Sigur Ros 

Thursday, April 14, 2011

My Album of The Month (March)


Dredg : The Pariah,The Parrot,The Delusion 2009

Thank You

I want to say thank you
for all the love destroyed
For all the just causes ,rejected,
for all my forzen laughters

Thank you;
 for this horror show
You solely lead 

Your acts of sarcasm,
stinks like rotten flesh 
Thank you ;
For all the mocked cuddles 
All the fake senses
After all this,
I swore i'd become a stronger one
To despise your rules


Imagine a world
Where hatred evaporates
and love dominates.
Thank you
Pedram

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Carry On

i'm leaving home,willing to fight till the end. i can feel the strength,
one more week ...

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Highway To Sheol

 


...for she has wounded many and thrown them down; indeed, she has slain a great multitude. Her house is a highway to Sheol, leading down to the chambers of death.

Proverbs 7:26-27 

Evening Star


'Twas noontide of summer,

And mid-time of night;
And stars, in their orbits,
Shone pale, thro' the light
Of the brighter, cold moon,
'Mid planets her slaves,
Herself in the Heavens,
Her beam on the waves.
I gazed awhile
On her cold smile;
Too cold- too cold for me-
There pass'd, as a shroud,
A fleecy cloud,
And I turned away to thee,
Proud Evening Star,
In thy glory afar,
And dearer thy beam shall be;
For joy to my heart
Is the proud part
Thou bearest in Heaven at night,
And more I admire
Thy distant fire,
Than that colder, lowly light. 
Edgar Allan Poe

خاطرات 3

روزی که روزبرگ بودن در حد فاصل 7 تا 11 فروردین اعلام شد،روز بسیار خوبی بود. یکشنبه 7 فروردین 1390

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Champion Roaring Back


Wayne Rooney celebrates his second goal for Manchester United against West Ham
Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson believes his side gave a title-winning performance against West Ham, after they overcame a two-goal deficit in the first half to defeat the Hammers 4-2 at Upton Park.
The Scot is confident that his team's second half performance shows they have the mentality to be champions this season, despite struggling with injuries and less than inspiring performances.
Speaking to Sky Sports, Ferguson said: “We played like champions today, and we played to our ability.
"It’s not an easy place to come with the fight for relegation and that result might put them [West Ham] in trouble.
“That was a championship winning performance.”
Ferguson served the second of his five-game touchline ban in Saturday’s lunchtime kick-off, yet his second half intervention which saw Patrice Evra replaced by Javier Hernandez helped United extend their lead at the top of the Premier League.
“It was eventful,” he continued. “Being two goals down at half time was a travesty considering the possession and chances created in the first half.

“We kept making chances in the first half, they couldn’t get the ball off Valencia in the first half and he delivered two or three fantastic balls, he had the opposition on toast really.
“We had to go for it, bring in Hernandez and put Gigs to left back. Goal difference didn’t matter, we needed to get something.

“Second half when Chicharito came on, he gave you pace and the running behind line we needed.
“There was a strong bench today with Nani, [Dimitar] Berbatov and [Michael] Owen. I thought if it was still 2-2 in last 10 minutes, then I would bring Michael on and go for it - going for it is vital to our club.”
The 69-year-old is currently serving a ban following comments made about Martin Atkinson in Manchester United’s 2-1 defeat to Chelsea, yet took a more sympathetic outlook to Lee Mason’s decision to award West Ham a penalty and not to send off Nemanja Vidic following a foul on Demba Ba.
“The second penalty kick was outside the box, so that was an unfortunate decision for us, but then Vidic could’ve been sent off for the challenge on Ba, so we got a lucky break.
“Although I did think Vidic was fouled at the start of that challenge - overall it was six and two threes - perhaps a red would have been harsh.”

@Goal.com
by : Andrew Kennedy

Friday, April 1, 2011

Beyond,Beyond


Caught in thy net of shadows,
What dreams hast thou to show?
Who treads the silent meadows,
To worship thee with love?
 
pic : Bykovo neo-gothic church