Showing posts with label Genetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genetics. Show all posts

Friday, December 31, 2010

Cancer Courts Immune Response to Aid Growth



In recent years, research has delved into the ways the body's immune system sometimes promotes disease rather than stifling it. Take inflammation. When you cut yourself, the red puffiness that ensues, called acute inflammation, is the body's way of signaling that something's gone wrong and help is needed. If all goes well, various immune cells move in, destroying any pathogens that might enter the wound and helping to repair the damaged tissue. As you heal, the inflammation subsides. However, much like stress—a natural response to crisis that is unhealthy as a steady state—inflammation appears to be useful in the short-term but bad over the long haul. Chronic low-level inflammation has been fingered as a root cause of many diseases, contributing to conditions from diabetes to cancer.
Research in mice has demonstrated that immune cells interact extensively with tumors, and not just to fight them off. Rather, cancers sometimes co-opt the immune system. For example, macrophages help guide metastasis, the spread of cancer cells from advanced tumors to other sites in the body. However, in mice it's been difficult to assess how the immune system interacts with the earliest stages of tumor development.
When an oncogene (a cancer-promoting gene) is activated or a tumor suppressor function lost, a cell can start to grow and divide faster than its neighbors. Eventually, transformed cells overtake the surrounding tissue and form tumors. A new animal study by Yi Feng and colleagues in the UK and Italy illuminates how single, newly-transformed cancer cells engage the body's immune response. Rather than mice, the team used zebrafish, which conserve many of the molecular and cellular components of tumor formation seen in mammals. Moreover, zebrafish larvae offer the advantage of being translucent, allowing investigators to live-image the very beginnings of tumors, when only one or two cells have been transformed.
Using zebrafish that had fluorescently labeled leukocytes, the team used several different tricks to express the human oncogene HRAS in early stage embryos. The oncogene was labeled with a different colored fluorescent tag and engineered to be switched on in melanocytes, specific skin pigment cells, only. The researchers then monitored the first hours and days of development. As the embryo grew, some of the cells were transformed by HRAS, and those transformed cells actively attracted the innate immune cells. The researchers got the same results when using a different oncogene, SRC, for their experiments and after inserting HRAS into a different cell population, mucus-secreting cells, and continued to see the same immune response.
To investigate the analogy that a tumor resembles a wound, the researchers made a laser cut in the same region of the zebrafish larvae where tumors had been observed and imaged the immune response. Early immune cells responded to the cut in a very similar manner. Both wounds and tumor cells produced H2O2, and the researchers found that immune cells traveled up the H2O2 gradient towards the cut or cancer.
However, in the case of the tumor, the inflammatory response never resolved, and researchers were able to visualize competing immune responses. Neutrophils and macrophages appeared to engulf cancerous cells, in line with the traditional “search and destroy” conception of immune response. However, other cells formed cytoplasmic tethers linking them to cancerous cells, and in some cases the cancerous cells appeared to drag leukocytes back when they started to leave the region. The tumors resembled chronic skin lesions more than acute cuts, supporting the common analogy that “a tumor is a wound that doesn't heal.”
Still, the researchers wanted to know whether the tumor was avoiding destruction or actually co-opting the immune cells in these earliest stages of development. To test this, they blocked the immune response in three different ways: they prevented the development of immune cells for the first three days after fertilization, and, separately, they used two different strategies to limit H2O2 production. In each case, immune cells failed to migrate to the cancer site. And each time, when the immune response was blocked, fewer cancer cells formed.
By visualizing the earliest interactions between cancer cells and their host environment, the researchers have shown that even from their earliest stages tumors don't just avoid being destroyed by the immune system. Rather, they appear to court an immune response, co-opting the body's innate immune system to aid and abet their growth.

Image :Destroyer or facilitator? An immune cell (red) glides over a doublet of V12Ras-transformed mucus-secreting cells, possible precursors of tumors, in a translucent, 3-day-old zebrafish larva.

By : Robin Mejia 
@PLOS Biology

Saturday, December 18, 2010

در مورد ساعت ساز نابینا و انتشارات مازیار



احساس خوبی است که در این همهمه توانستم دو کتاب را تمام کنم.انتخاب کتاب  ترجمه شده ی ریچارد داوکینز یک ریسک بزرگ بود ،از چند نظر هم ریسک آمیز بود : اول این که ترجمه بود !! دوم این که در حوزه ی بیولوژی مولکولی-سلولی،ژنتیک و تکامل با نثر کسی در ابعاد داوکینز نوشته شده است و سوم این که به علت تعلل خودم، این کتاب زمانی مطالعه می شد که یک ذهنیت قوی نسبت به دیدگاه های نویسنده در من ایجاد شده بود. اساسا برای خواندن کتابی که صفحه-صفحه و سطر به سطرمتکی  بر قضاوت های عقلانی خواننده  است ،این یک نکته منفی است.تا حدودی لذت دریافت دست اول ایده ها ی نویسنده به این ترتیب زائل شده بود.(به عنوان نمونه من این لذت کم نظیر را  درسال دوم راهنمایی با خواندن جنایت ومکافات تجربه کردم) اما ورای لذت ،خواندن داوکینز برای من به سان یک باید،یک باید خیلی جدی مطرح بوده و باید به هر حال از یک زمان و یک اثر شروع می شد.در مورد ترجمه ی کتاب  میتوانم بگویم روان و یکدست بود و برای خواننده مشکل بزرگی از نظر فهم مطالب ایجاد نمی کرد. این که مترجمین در مواجهه با جمله بندی،کلمات  و ارجاعات نویسنده متحمل چه زحمتی شده اند ،قابل تصور است.(جا دارد اشاره کنم که 7فصل اول کتاب توسط مرحوم دکتر محمودبهزاد با همکاری خانم شهلا باقری ترجمه شده و از فصل 8 تا انتهای کتاب را خانم باقری ترجمه و دکتر محمدرضاغفاری ویرایش نموده اند.) قضاوت نهایی درباره ی کیفیت ترجمه بر عهده اهل فن ...اما یک نکته شایان تقدیر در مورد ناشر کتاب است (نشر مازیار)که در وضع اقتصادی موجود و با علم به سلیقه ی کتابخوانی غالب در جامعه،روی این کتاب و این حوزه ی محجور یعنی زیست شناسی تکامل سرمایه گذاری نموده است.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Mice Created From Two Males

Gay mice couple gives birth to their own genetic child!
 US scientists have used stem cell technology to create mice from two males, an advance that they say could help preserve endangered species and even help same-sex couples have their own genetic children one day.

Gay mice couple gives birth to their own genetic child!
According to the study that was published in journal Biology of Reproduction, reproductive scientists in Texas were able to manipulate cells from a male (XY) mouse fetus to produce an induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell line.
There iPS cells are adult cells that have undergone some genetic reprogramming in order to enter an embryonic stem cell-like state.
Some of the cells that were grown from this new line spontaneously lost their Y chromosome, turning them into XO cells.
Those XO cells were injected into embryos from donor female mice and transplanted into surrogate mouse moms who gave birth to babies with one X chromosome from the original male mouse.
Those babies grew and later mated with normal male mice. There offspring, both male and female, showed genetic contributions from two fathers.

The study was let by Richard R. Berhringer at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Researchers said that with a variation of their technique, “it may also to possible to generate sperm from a female done and produce viable male and female progeny with two mothers.”
However, the study cautioned that the ability to replicate the finding in humans was a long way off.
Looks like the first gay mice couple were even able to get their own child!